The Heritage Foundation’s initiative, known as Project 2025, aims to construct an extensive database to place ideologically aligned operatives into pivotal government roles by January 2025.
This strategy marks a profound departure from the traditional principles of American governance and poses a significant challenge to the bedrock of our democracy.
At the core of Project 2025 is a recruitment process that prioritizes ideological loyalty over professional expertise.
This approach threatens to create a government dominated by individuals whose primary allegiance is to a specific set of beliefs, rather than to the constitution and the diverse populace it governs.
Such a strategy undermines the fundamental tenets of public service: impartiality, evidence-based policy-making, and a dedication to the common good.
Diversity of thought, scientific rigor, and open dialogue are the pillars upon which effective governance rests. These principles foster unity and progress, transcending political divides.
However, by filling government positions with partisans, Project 2025 risks transforming these roles from stewards of the public interest into agents of partisan agendas.
The essence of true public service lies in prioritizing the country’s welfare over partisan objectives, serving every citizen with equal dedication.
Our government should be a reflection of our collective will, addressing the needs and aspirations of all Americans and bridging ideological divides rather than deepening them.
By reshaping the civil service into an echo chamber for a singular ideology, Project 2025 undermines the social contract between the government and its people. It converts public service from a mechanism of collective problem-solving into a tool for ideological enforcement.
As Americans, we are entitled to a government staffed by individuals selected for their competence, integrity, and commitment to serving the public interest. Accepting anything less not only undermines the ideals upon which our nation was founded but also threatens the very pillars of our democratic system.
It is our collective responsibility to demand a government that faithfully serves and represents all its citizens, fostering a society grounded in equity, justice, and mutual respect.
This commitment to a balanced and representative federal workforce is essential for maintaining the integrity of our institutions and ensuring that our government remains a true democracy, resilient and responsive to the needs of all Americans.
Would you like to be considered for a position in a future presidential Administration and participate in our trainings? Complete the questionnaire below and upload your resume for inclusion in the Presidential Personnel Database and to receive access to the Presidential Administration Academy.
Project 2025 is the effort of a broad coalition of conservative organizations that have come together to ensure a successful Administration begins in January 2025. With the right conservative policy recommendations and properly vetted and trained personnel to implement them, we will take back our government. Project 2025 is being organized by The Heritage Foundation.
To learn more about positions in the Executive Branch, please refer to the 2020 Plum Book. (FOUND BELOW)
Your use of this website, and any information you submit through it, is governed by our Terms and Conditions.
General
- Title
- Legal First Name
- Legal Last Name
- Mobile Phone
- Address Address Line 1
- Address Line 2
- City
- State
- Zip/Postal Code
Political and Philosophical Approach
- Select the option(s) that best describe your political philosophy.
- (Drop-down menu options: Traditional Conservative Fiscal Conservative Libertarian Moderate Social Conservative Neoconservative Liberal Paleoconservative Progressive)
- Please briefly explain your choice(s) of philosophy.
- (Short answer text box)
- Name one person, past or present, who has most influenced the development of your political philosophy.
- (Short answer text box)
- Name a book that has most significantly shaped your political philosophy, and please explain its influence on your thinking.
- (Short answer text box)
- Name one living public policy figure whom you greatly admire and why.
- (Short answer text box)
- Name the one public policy issue you are most passionate about. Why are you passionate about this issue and how would you like to see it addressed in the future?
- (Short answer text box)
- How did you hear about Project 2025? If Conference, Media appearance, or Other, please specify.
- (Short answer text box)
Do you agree with the following statements?
- The U.N. should have authority over the citizens or public policies of sovereign nations.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The U.S. has the right to select immigrants based on country of origin.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The education industry should be opened to increased competition through vouchers or tax credits for private schools.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- Life has a right to legal protection from conception to natural death.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The permanent institutions of family and religion are foundational to American freedom and the common good.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- Government should subsidize the use or production of energy, particularly for new and innovative energy technologies.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- Union membership should be at the option of the employee, not a requirement for employment.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The federal government should guarantee a universal basic income.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The U.S. needs nationalized health care.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The U.S. should increase legal immigration.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The police in America are systemically racist.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- We should be proud of our American heritage and history, even as we acknowledge our flaws.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The gender wage gap is the result of prejudice and discrimination.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The U.S. should scale back its strong military presence overseas.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- In combatting censorship by Big Tech, we must look to more than just the free market.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The President should be able to advance his/her agenda through the bureaucracy without hinderance from unelected federal officials.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The federal government should recognize only two unchanging sexes, male and female, as a matter of policy.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)
- The U.S. should impose tariffs with the goal of bringing back manufacturing jobs, even if these tariffs result in higher consumer prices.
- (Drop-down menu: Agree, Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree)